Amir GanjavieThe Phoenician Scheme, Wes Anderson’s latest cinematic contraption, unfolds like an intricate toy — delicate, ornate, and almost too carefully assembled to be played with. And yet, beneath its vibrant hues, symmetrical compositions, and exquisitely curated artifice lies a darker, more corrosive spirit — a farce about wealth, guilt, and the impossible desire to reconstruct what has already been shattered. Once again, Anderson returns to the familiar terrain of familial wounds, but this time he does so with an aggression that verges on the grotesque. This is perhaps his most violently cheerful film to date — a work that dances at the edge of implosion, balancing between sincerity and stylization, devotion and delusion.
Zsa-Zsa Korda, the film’s central figure played by a masterfully deadpan Benicio del Toro, is a tycoon of mythical proportions. A capitalist chimera drawn from the ghosts of Onassis, Trump, and Musk, he moves through a fictional desert state known as “Greater Independent Phoenicia” with the ambition to create an infrastructural empire — a project grandly named “The Phoenician Scheme.” But this scheme is not just economic; it is metaphysical. Zsa-Zsa seeks not only to conquer land and resources but to overwrite history itself, to possess a region that doesn’t yet exist, and to impose order on a world fundamentally resistant to it.
Anderson dresses this conquest in the absurdity of bureaucratic sabotage, airborne assassination attempts, meetings with railroad barons, and visits to godlike figures in sterile, black-and-white heavens. God is played by Bill Murray, naturally — not as a divine source of justice but as a kind of celestial therapist presiding over a Dreyer-esque tribunal. Through it all, Zsa-Zsa insists, with disturbing calm, that he feels “very safe.” Safety, in this context, is not the absence of danger but the illusion of control — a delusion sustained through wealth, aphorisms, and the refusal to look backward.
At the heart of this overstuffed carnival lies a more intimate tragedy: a broken bond between father and daughter. Liesl, Zsa-Zsa’s estranged and possibly not-quite-biological daughter, is a novice nun who becomes his unexpected heir. She is played with exquisite restraint by Mia Threapleton, who brings both severity and grace to the role — a moral anchor in a film otherwise buoyed by lunacy. Their journey together, alongside the lovably awkward Norwegian entomologist Bjorn (Michael Cera, in his natural habitat), is part financial quest, part metaphysical reckoning. Liesl shines a light into the hollow grandeur of her father’s ambition and exposes its rot: the emptiness of legacy, the absurdity of redemption bought through schemes and shareholders.
And yet, for all its philosophical weight, the film often staggers under the heft of its own cleverness. Each sequence — from hand grenade negotiations to slapstick railgun battles — risks becoming an isolated vignette. Cameos dazzle, jokes flutter and stall, and somewhere between the perfectly color-coded costumes and the ticking metronome of Desplat’s score, one begins to long for stillness, for breath, for silence. The movie, like its protagonist, is so busy planning that it forgets to devote itself to anything. Even the emotional epiphany — the slow thaw between father and daughter — feels stifled by the ornate diorama that entombs it.
What The Phoenician Scheme ultimately reveals is that family is both the origin of the wound and the only possible balm. The titular scheme is not merely about land and labor but about filling the void that lies at the center of Zsa-Zsa’s existence. He learns, too late, that love cannot be designed, that affection cannot be structured like a deal. “Planning doesn’t matter,” he says. “What matters is the sincerity of your devotion.” But in Anderson’s universe — where everything is designed — sincerity remains a question, a fragile flame flickering beneath layers of irony, precision, and cinematic lacquer.
This film doesn’t offer a resolution. It leaves us, like its protagonist, somewhere between heaven and the desert, between a plan and a prayer. Perhaps it is enough. Or perhaps, like all great farces, it is a mirror turned inward, reflecting the tragicomedy of our yearning to make order from the chaos of inheritance.
© 2020-2025. UniversalCinema Mag.
